President Trump’s “America First” foreign policy is facing its ultimate test over the fate of Taiwan. A demand from China for the U.S. to “oppose” Taiwanese independence is forcing the administration to decide what “America First” truly means in the context of great power competition.
Does “America First” mean prioritizing a short-term trade deal with China, even if it means abandoning a long-standing democratic partner and undermining regional stability? Or does it mean upholding the principles of self-determination and standing by allies, recognizing that this is in America’s long-term strategic interest?
The Chinese demand to shift U.S. policy from “not supporting” to “opposing” independence brings this question into sharp relief. A decision to accommodate Beijing would be seen by many as a betrayal of American values and a strategic retreat. A decision to hold firm would be a powerful statement of American resolve.
The administration’s transactional approach has created ambiguity about where it will land on this issue. Past actions, such as using security measures as bargaining chips in trade talks, suggest that a deal at Taiwan’s expense is a real possibility.
The outcome of this test will have far-reaching implications. It will define the meaning of “America First” in Asia and will send a clear signal to both allies and adversaries about the nature of American commitments in the 21st century. For Taiwan, whose very existence is on the line, the answer cannot come soon enough.
The Ultimate Test of “America First”: Taiwan’s Fate on the Line
